<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some notes on fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logophile.org/blog/2010/04/28/some-notes-on-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2010/04/28/some-notes-on-fonts/</link>
	<description>blog of a logophile (not "logos", but "λόγος")</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2010/04/28/some-notes-on-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=878#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, another thing that is likely to go wrong is bibtex-driven case changes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, another thing that is likely to go wrong is bibtex-driven case changes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2010/04/28/some-notes-on-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=878#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fontwise I like to play around --- &quot;need&quot; isn&#039;t the issue ^_^&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bibtex and unicode: my understanding is that bibtex assumes single-byte encodings (&lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.tex/msg/8aefd925c735c842&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Philipp Lehman explains on comp.text.tex&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The nasty bit is that you can&#039;t tell that bibtex is doing anything wrong in the vast majority of cases: if you&#039;re just moving around strings it doesn&#039;t matter if it has the right idea or the wrong idea about their internals. The error only shows up (afaik) if the bibtex style counts characters. (Of course I prefer a style that happens to do this.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the upside, this means that if it&#039;s working for you there&#039;s no need to change. And for Polish and I guess Norwegian there is always the fallback to (La)TeX macros for the occasional non-ascii characters (only needed in the bibliography, and only in fields that the style will chop out characters from). For Greek that&#039;s not an option.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fontwise I like to play around &#8212; &#8220;need&#8221; isn&#8217;t the issue ^_^</p>

<p>Bibtex and unicode: my understanding is that bibtex assumes single-byte encodings (<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.tex/msg/8aefd925c735c842" rel="nofollow">Philipp Lehman explains on comp.text.tex</a>).</p>

<p>The nasty bit is that you can&#8217;t tell that bibtex is doing anything wrong in the vast majority of cases: if you&#8217;re just moving around strings it doesn&#8217;t matter if it has the right idea or the wrong idea about their internals. The error only shows up (afaik) if the bibtex style counts characters. (Of course I prefer a style that happens to do this.)</p>

<p>On the upside, this means that if it&#8217;s working for you there&#8217;s no need to change. And for Polish and I guess Norwegian there is always the fallback to (La)TeX macros for the occasional non-ascii characters (only needed in the bibliography, and only in fields that the style will chop out characters from). For Greek that&#8217;s not an option.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkazmierczak</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2010/04/28/some-notes-on-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>pkazmierczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=878#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;quite neat, I didn&#039;t know about xetex. otoh I never needed any fonts other than those supplied by texlive, but if I ever need them it&#039;s nice to know how to use them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;now about unicode: I&#039;m actually using latex-ucs package and it works fine, also for bibtex. perhaps it doesn&#039;t work for Greek for some reason, but it sure does work for Polish and Norwegian.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite neat, I didn&#8217;t know about xetex. otoh I never needed any fonts other than those supplied by texlive, but if I ever need them it&#8217;s nice to know how to use them.</p>

<p>now about unicode: I&#8217;m actually using latex-ucs package and it works fine, also for bibtex. perhaps it doesn&#8217;t work for Greek for some reason, but it sure does work for Polish and Norwegian.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

