http://www.logophile.org/blog/2009/02/06/three-and-a-half-horses/ blog of a logophile (not "logos", but "λόγος") Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:21:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.logophile.org/blog/2009/02/06/three-and-a-half-horses/comment-page-1/#comment-6118 (b)logophile › Naked mole rats Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:00:25 +0000 http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=552#comment-6118 <p>[...] noted recently a certain zoological obsession on the part of formal semanticists. It’s not just formal [...]</p> [...] noted recently a certain zoological obsession on the part of formal semanticists. It’s not just formal [...]

]]> http://www.logophile.org/blog/2009/02/06/three-and-a-half-horses/comment-page-1/#comment-6111 tikitu Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:38:11 +0000 http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=552#comment-6111 <p>HPSG handles penguins & small giraffes. Makes sense to me.</p> HPSG handles penguins & small giraffes. Makes sense to me.

]]> http://www.logophile.org/blog/2009/02/06/three-and-a-half-horses/comment-page-1/#comment-6110 Ryszard Szopa Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:41:20 +0000 http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=552#comment-6110 <p>The HPSG people choose cute animals for their examples. All the Spanish examples from <em>Syntactic Theory</em> (Sag-Wasow-Bender) involve penguins and giraffes... <em>Small</em> penguins and giraffes, if I may add.</p> The HPSG people choose cute animals for their examples. All the Spanish examples from Syntactic Theory (Sag-Wasow-Bender) involve penguins and giraffes… Small penguins and giraffes, if I may add.

]]>