<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fine print (a scam? a shame?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/12/14/fine-print-a-scam-a-shame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/12/14/fine-print-a-scam-a-shame/</link>
	<description>blog of a logophile (not "logos", but "λόγος")</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/12/14/fine-print-a-scam-a-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=235#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A site that plays an audio advertisement for their own services when you open the page, and doesn&#039;t have a &#039;mute&#039; button, doesn&#039;t inspire much confidence I&#039;m afraid -- I&#039;ll pass.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A site that plays an audio advertisement for their own services when you open the page, and doesn&#8217;t have a &#8216;mute&#8217; button, doesn&#8217;t inspire much confidence I&#8217;m afraid &#8212; I&#8217;ll pass.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/12/14/fine-print-a-scam-a-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-5151</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=235#comment-5151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You would be shocked to find whole list of scam &amp; fraud report on http://www.scamclub.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would be shocked to find whole list of scam &amp; fraud report on <a href="http://www.scamclub.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scamclub.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/12/14/fine-print-a-scam-a-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-5153</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=235#comment-5153</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s the &quot;should be&quot; in &quot;a company as sensitive to scams as PayPal should be&quot; that&#039;s got me worried. On the &lt;em&gt;bright&lt;/em&gt; side, you just gave an argument for it being a phishing attack by someone who is at the &lt;em&gt;same time&lt;/em&gt; diabolically clever and painfully stupid. I give it up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the &#8220;should be&#8221; in &#8220;a company as sensitive to scams as PayPal should be&#8221; that&#8217;s got me worried. On the <em>bright</em> side, you just gave an argument for it being a phishing attack by someone who is at the <em>same time</em> diabolically clever and painfully stupid. I give it up.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/12/14/fine-print-a-scam-a-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-5152</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=235#comment-5152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, looking at it, my money is on &#039;stupid&#039; rather than &#039;phishing&#039;. Surely in a company as sensitive to scams as Paypal should be, they&#039;d do something smart like run all emails through someone who has an idea of how email scams work, to make sure that they don&#039;t make things that look like one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, looking at it, my money is on &#8216;stupid&#8217; rather than &#8216;phishing&#8217;. Surely in a company as sensitive to scams as Paypal should be, they&#8217;d do something smart like run all emails through someone who has an idea of how email scams work, to make sure that they don&#8217;t make things that look like one.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

