Comments on: Functioning acceptably http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/09/22/functioning-acceptably/ blog of a logophile (not "logos", but "λόγος") Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:42:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: tikitu http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/09/22/functioning-acceptably/comment-page-1/#comment-4951 tikitu Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:12:21 +0000 http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=219#comment-4951 <p>Cheers -- although that should be 'Tikitu "Proofread" de Jager' (and yes, I just realised it wasn't in the post either -- now fixed).</p> <p>In other news, I've found out why Spam Karma doesn't like you: it considers a wordpress url a black mark. But don't despair, your old accepted comments are slowly weighting your karma upwards, pretty soon it'll realise you're ok after all.</p> Cheers — although that should be ‘Tikitu “Proofread” de Jager’ (and yes, I just realised it wasn’t in the post either — now fixed).

In other news, I’ve found out why Spam Karma doesn’t like you: it considers a wordpress url a black mark. But don’t despair, your old accepted comments are slowly weighting your karma upwards, pretty soon it’ll realise you’re ok after all.

]]> By: szopa http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/09/22/functioning-acceptably/comment-page-1/#comment-4950 szopa Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:04:45 +0000 http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=219#comment-4950 <p>Samson “Proofread“ de Jager? Sounds cool.</p> Samson “Proofread“ de Jager? Sounds cool.

]]>