<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google image search barriers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/</link>
	<description>blog of a logophile (not "logos", but "λόγος")</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4634</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True. Although when someone is waiting anxiously for the experimental results, then it's less appealing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Congratulations, by the way! I guess I'm late with that, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. Although when someone is waiting anxiously for the experimental results, then it&#8217;s less appealing.</p>

<p>Congratulations, by the way! I guess I&#8217;m late with that, sorry.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szopa</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>szopa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hum... I find the idea of having to wait days for the results of one's experiments in some weird way appealing... You know, just like alchimists or (not to look far away) the early days computer scientists. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum&#8230; I find the idea of having to wait days for the results of one&#8217;s experiments in some weird way appealing&#8230; You know, just like alchimists or (not to look far away) the early days computer scientists. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hm, didn't think of that. The upside would be that my WP plugin &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; handle lists. Of course the trouble is that I can't really try out variations and see what the result is, at least not without waiting days in between.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, didn&#8217;t think of that. The upside would be that my WP plugin <em>does</em> handle lists. Of course the trouble is that I can&#8217;t really try out variations and see what the result is, at least not without waiting days in between.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szopa</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>szopa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried using a list with "list-style-type: none;" set for the items? I think &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; should be a clear sign for google. (Of course, this involves some html-fun, but imho it's cleaner than tables.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried using a list with &#8220;list-style-type: none;&#8221; set for the items? I think <em>that</em> should be a clear sign for google. (Of course, this involves some html-fun, but imho it&#8217;s cleaner than tables.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.064 seconds -->
