<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google image search barriers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/</link>
	<description>blog of a logophile (not "logos", but "λόγος")</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4634</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True. Although when someone is waiting anxiously for the experimental results, then it&#039;s less appealing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Congratulations, by the way! I guess I&#039;m late with that, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. Although when someone is waiting anxiously for the experimental results, then it&#8217;s less appealing.</p>

<p>Congratulations, by the way! I guess I&#8217;m late with that, sorry.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szopa</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>szopa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hum... I find the idea of having to wait days for the results of one&#039;s experiments in some weird way appealing... You know, just like alchimists or (not to look far away) the early days computer scientists. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum&#8230; I find the idea of having to wait days for the results of one&#8217;s experiments in some weird way appealing&#8230; You know, just like alchimists or (not to look far away) the early days computer scientists. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikitu</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>tikitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hm, didn&#039;t think of that. The upside would be that my WP plugin &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; handle lists. Of course the trouble is that I can&#039;t really try out variations and see what the result is, at least not without waiting days in between.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, didn&#8217;t think of that. The upside would be that my WP plugin <em>does</em> handle lists. Of course the trouble is that I can&#8217;t really try out variations and see what the result is, at least not without waiting days in between.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szopa</title>
		<link>http://www.logophile.org/blog/2006/08/25/google-image-search-barriers/comment-page-1/#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>szopa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logophile.org/blog/?p=202#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried using a list with &quot;list-style-type: none;&quot; set for the items? I think &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; should be a clear sign for google. (Of course, this involves some html-fun, but imho it&#039;s cleaner than tables.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried using a list with &#8220;list-style-type: none;&#8221; set for the items? I think <em>that</em> should be a clear sign for google. (Of course, this involves some html-fun, but imho it&#8217;s cleaner than tables.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

